Yes, a person with an intellectual disability or a learning disability can receive disability benefits, if certain criteria are met.
One way that a person may be found eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits is by meeting a listing. Social Security’s Listings of Impairments contain criteria for many types of impairments. If a person meets these criteria, he or she can be found disabled.
Listing 12.05, Intellectual Disability, consists of an introductory paragraph and four different sets of criteria: A, B, C and D. An impairment that satisfies the introductory diagnostic description and any one of the four sets of criteria, will meet the listing. The full listing is available on Social Security’s website, but here we will focus on Listing 12.05C, which may commonly arise at the hearing level.
Listing 12.05 Intellectual disability states the following:
Intellectual disability refers to significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22.
The required level of severity for this disorder is met when the requirements in A, B, C, or D are satisfied. …
C. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function.
Thus, to meet the listing, the claimant must have:
To meet the first requirement, the claimant must be given an IQ test that results in a Full-Scale IQ of 70 or below. (If a claimant scores below 60, he or she may be found disabled under Listing 12.05B without the need for the additional limitation that Listing 12.5C requires. If a claimant scores above 70 but not by much, an argument of borderline intellectual functioning may be fruitful.) A test administered by a qualified professional should be presumed valid, provided there is no evidence of malingering.
Regarding evidence of onset before age 22, school records are ideal. If school records are not available, it is important to note that many federal circuits have adopted the presumption adopted by the 11th Circuit in Hodges v. Barnhart, 276 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2001):
We agree with other circuits in concluding that there is a presumption that mental retardation is a condition that remains constant throughout life. Therefore, we find that a claimant need not present evidence that she manifested deficits in adaptive functioning prior to the age twenty-two, when she presented evidence of low IQ test results after the age of twenty-two.
The 11th Circuit noted in Hodges that the “presumption of a fairly constant mental capacity before the age of twenty-two,” may be rebutted by substantial evidence of the claimant’s daily life.
In addition to the IQ criterion, Listing 12.05C requires “a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function.” It should be noted that the severity requirement for this criterion is the same as the severity requirement in a Step Two analysis. Thus, if a “severe” physical impairment is found in Step Two, this satisfies Paragraph C’s requirement of “additional and significant.” See 65 Fed. Reg. 50,746 at 50,772 (Aug. 21, 2000): “We have always intended the phrase [significant work-related limitation of function] to mean that the other impairment is a ‘severe’ impairment, as defined in §§ 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c).”
If a claimant does not meet a listing, then his or her intellectual functioning may still result in work-related limitations that result in a finding of disability at Step Five.
The information on this website does not constitute legal advice. Your use of this website, including the email contact form or comments form, does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In Florida, Brendan Conley practices Social Security disability law exclusively. Copyright Brendan Conley 2013-2017.